Clinical features of seronegative, but CSF antibody-positive, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis

To determine the frequency of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis without detectable serum NMDAR antibodies and to compare the clinical features of these patients with those with NMDAR antibodies in serum and CSF.This is a retrospective assessment of serum antibody status and clinical features of 489 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, defined by the presence of NMDAR antibodies in the CSF, and available paired serum/CSF samples examined at Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, between January 2007 and December 2017. NMDAR antibodies were determined with rat brain immunostaining, in-house cell-based assay (CBA), and a commercial CBA. Patients were considered seronegative if NMDAR antibodies were undetectable with the 3 indicated techniques.Serum NMDAR antibodies were not detected in 75 of 489 (15%) patients. Compared with the 414 seropositive patients, the seronegative were older (23.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 17-43] vs 20.5 [IQR: 14-31]; p < 0.0001) and less frequently women (39 [52%] vs 313 [76%]; p < 0.001) and had less tumors (6 [9%] vs 128 [32%]; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.35 [per decade]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.67), absence of tumor (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.43), and less need for intensive care unit admission (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18-0.69) were independent variables associated with the absence of serum NMDAR antibodies. Time to diagnosis, treatment with immunotherapy, relapses, and outcome were similar in seronegative and seropositive patients.NMDAR antibodies are not detected in the serum of 15% of the patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. These patients appear to be older and have milder neurologic symptoms with less frequency of tumors.Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology

Limitations of a commercial assay as diagnostic test of autoimmune encephalitis

Detection of neuronal surface antibodies (NSAb) is important for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Although most clinical laboratories use a commercial diagnostic kit (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) based on indirect immunofluorescence on transfected cells (IIFA), clinical experience suggests diagnostic limitations. Here, we assessed the performance of the commercial IIFA in serum and CSF samples of patients with suspected AE previously examined by rat brain immunohistochemistry (Cohort A). Of 6213 samples, 404 (6.5%) showed brain immunostaining suggestive of NSAb: 163 (40%) were positive by commercial IIFA and 241 (60%) were negative. When these 241 samples were re-assessed with in-house IIFA, 42 (18%) were positive: 21 (9%) had NSAb against antigens not included in the commercial IIFA and the other 21 (9%) had NSAb against antigens included in the commercial kit (false negative results). False negative results occurred more frequently with CSF (29% vs 10% in serum) and predominantly affected GABABR (39%), LGI1 (17%) and AMPAR (11%) antibodies. Results were reproduced in a separate cohort (B) of 54 AE patients with LGI1, GABABR or AMPAR antibodies in CSF which were missed in 30% by commercial IIFA. Patients with discordant GABABR antibody results (positive in-house but negative commercial IIFA) were less likely to develop full-blown clinical syndrome; no significant clinical differences were noted for the other antibodies. Overall, NSAb testing by commercial IIFA led to false negative results in a substantial number of patients, mainly those affected by anti-LG1, GABABR or AMPAR encephalitis. If these disorders are suspected and commercial IIFA is negative, more comprehensive antibody studies are recommende

The diagnosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis varies with the type of immunodetection assay and sample examined

Detection of Leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibodies in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis is important for diagnostic confirmation and prompt implementation of immunomodulatory treatment. However, the clinical laboratory diagnosis can be challenging. Previous reports have suggested that the type of test and patient's sample (serum or CSF) have different clinical performances, however, there are no studies comparing different diagnostic tests on paired serum/CSF samples of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of a commercial and an in house indirect immunofluorescent cell based assays (IIF-CBA) using paired serum/CSF of 70 patients with suspected anti-LGI1 encephalitis and positive rat brain indirect immunohistochemistry (IIHC). We found that all (100%) patients had CSF antibodies when the in house IIF-CBA was used, but only 88 (83%) were positive if the commercial test was used. In contrast, sera positivity rate was higher with the commercial test (94%) than with the in house assay (86%). If both serum and CSF were examined with the commercial IIFA-CBA, 69/70 (98.5%) patients were positive in at least one of the samples. These findings are clinically important for centers in which rat brain IIHC and in house IIFA-CBA are not available. Moreover, the observation that all patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis have antibodies in CSF is in line with the concept that these antibodies are pathogenic.Copyright © 2022 Muñoz-Sánchez, Planagumà, Naranjo, Couso, Sabater, Guasp, Martínez-Hernández, Graus, Dalmau and Ruiz-García

Seizure-related 6 homolog like 2 autoimmunity: Neurologic syndrome and antibody effects

Objective: To describe the clinical syndrome of 4 new patients with seizure-related 6 homolog like 2 antibodies (SEZ6L2-abs), study the antibody characteristics, and evaluate their effects on neuronal cultures. Methods: SEZ6L2-abs were initially identified in serum and CSF of a patient with cerebellar ataxia by immunohistochemistry on rat brain sections and immunoprecipitation from rat cerebellar neurons. We used a cell-based assay (CBA) of HEK293 cells transfected with SEZ6L2 to test the serum of 95 patients with unclassified neuropil antibodies, 331 with different neurologic disorders, and 10 healthy subjects. Additional studies included characterization of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses and the effects of SEZ6L2-abs on cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. Results: In addition to the index patient, SEZ6L2-abs were identified by CBA in 3/95 patients with unclassified neuropil antibodies but in none of the 341 controls. The median age of the 4 patients was 62 years (range: 54-69 years), and 2 were female. Patients presented with subacute gait ataxia, dysarthria, and mild extrapyramidal symptoms. Initial brain MRI was normal, and CSF pleocytosis was found in only 1 patient. None improved with immunotherapy. SEZ6L2-abs recognized conformational epitopes. IgG4 SEZ6L2-abs were found in all 4 patients, and it was the predominant subclass in 2. SEZ6L2-abs did not alter the number of total or synaptic SEZ6L2 or the AMPA glutamate receptor 1 (GluA1) clusters on the surface of hippocampal neurons. Conclusions: SEZ6L2-abs associate with a subacute cerebellar syndrome with frequent extrapyramidal symptoms. The potential pathogenic effect of the antibodies is not mediated by internalization of the antigen

Thymoma and Autoimmune Encephalitis: Clinical Manifestations and Antibodies

To report the clinical, neuroimaging, and antibody associations in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and thymoma.A retrospective cohort study of 43 patients was conducted. Antibody determination and immunoprecipitation to characterize novel antigens were performed using reported techniques.Patients' median age was 52 years (range: 23-88 years). Forty (93%) had neuronal surface antibodies: gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor A (GABAAR) (15), amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) (13), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) (4), leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) (3), glycine receptor (GlyR) (3), and unknown antigens (2). Concurrent antibodies against intracellular antigens occurred in 13 (30%; 9 anti-collapsin response mediator protein 5 [CRMP5]) and were more frequent in anti-AMPAR encephalitis (54% vs 20%; p = 0.037). The most common clinical presentation was encephalitis with multiple T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense lesions in 23 (53%) patients (15 GABAAR, 5 AMPAR, and 1 unknown neuropil antibody), followed by encephalitis with peripheral nerve hyperexcitability in 7 (16%; 4 CASPR2, 2 LGI1, and 1 unknown antibody), limbic encephalitis in 6 (14%; 4 AMPAR, 1 LGI1, and 1 antibody negative), progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus in 4 (9%; 3 GlyR and 1 AMPAR antibodies), and encephalitis with normal MRI in 3 (7%; AMPAR antibodies). Anti-GABAAR encephalitis was more prevalent in Japanese patients compared with Caucasians and other ethnicities (61% vs 16%; p = 0.003). In anti-AMPAR encephalitis, 3/4 patients with poor and 0/6 with good outcome had concurrent CRMP5 antibodies (p = 0.033). Immunoprecipitation studies identified metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 antibodies that were additionally found in 5 patients (3 with and 2 without encephalitis).AE in patients with thymoma include several clinical-radiologic syndromes that vary according to the associated antibodies. Anti-GABAAR encephalitis was the most frequent AE and occurred more frequently in Japanese patients

AICLE - CLIL - EMILE : educació plurilingüe. Experiencias, research & polítiques

Aquest volum és resultat del projecte R+D+i EDU2010-15783 Discurso Académico en lengua extranjera: Aprendizaje y evaluación de contenidos científicos en el aula multilingüe, finançat pel MICINN.El present volum és el resultat de la selecció de les millors comunicacions presentades en la primera Taula Rodona Internacional TRI-CLIL sobre Aprenentatge Integrat de Continguts i Llengües (AICLE). El congrés va aconseguir reunir professionals de la docència i de la recerca, tant de matèries escolars, llengües estrangeres i llengües considerades oficials o co-oficials a diferents territoris, que esdevenen llengües addicionals per a la població escolar migrada

Evidence of neurophysiological improvement of early manifestations of small-fiber dysfunction after liver transplantation in a patient with familial amyloid neuropathy

Introduction: Small fiber polyneuropathy (SFP) is a common heralding clinical manifestation of damage to the nervous system in patients with familial amyloidosis. The diagnosis of SFP is a significant factor in the decision to treat a previously asymptomatic gene carrier, as treatment would prevent irreversible nerve damage. This requires detection of the earliest but unequivocal signs of peripheral nerve involvement. Case report: We present the case of a young female who was diagnosed of SFP, supported by data from quantitative sensory testing. She had preserved sensory nerve action potentials in the distalmost nerves of her feet and recordable nociceptive evoked potentials. She was successfully transplanted the liver from a previously healthy donor, and recovered fully of her symptoms and signs. Improvement was documented with repeated psychophysical and electrodiagnostic testing in the course of 4 years after transplantation. Significance: This case illustrates the utility of psychophysical testing to support the diagnosis of SFP. Keywords: Small fiber polyneuropathy, Familial amyloidosis, Quantitative sensory testing, Nociceptive evoked potentials, Psychophysical testing, Liver transplantatio

Table_1_The diagnosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis varies with the type of immunodetection assay and sample examined.docx

Detection of Leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibodies in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis is important for diagnostic confirmation and prompt implementation of immunomodulatory treatment. However, the clinical laboratory diagnosis can be challenging. Previous reports have suggested that the type of test and patient’s sample (serum or CSF) have different clinical performances, however, there are no studies comparing different diagnostic tests on paired serum/CSF samples of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of a commercial and an in house indirect immunofluorescent cell based assays (IIF-CBA) using paired serum/CSF of 70 patients with suspected anti-LGI1 encephalitis and positive rat brain indirect immunohistochemistry (IIHC). We found that all (100%) patients had CSF antibodies when the in house IIF-CBA was used, but only 88 (83%) were positive if the commercial test was used. In contrast, sera positivity rate was higher with the commercial test (94%) than with the in house assay (86%). If both serum and CSF were examined with the commercial IIFA-CBA, 69/70 (98.5%) patients were positive in at least one of the samples. These findings are clinically important for centers in which rat brain IIHC and in house IIFA-CBA are not available. Moreover, the observation that all patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis have antibodies in CSF is in line with the concept that these antibodies are pathogenic.</p